MAR-90250300HU-B vs MAR-90250405HU — Compare
Martin Mac Viper Xip In Cardboard B-Stock vs Martin MAC Aura Raven XIP in SiP
The Martin MAC Viper XIP delivers higher peak brightness (28,000 lumens) with a tighter zoom range ideal for spotting and long-throw applications, while the Martin MAC Aura Raven XIP prioritizes pixel-level LED control and rich color mixing with a larger front lens for wash applications. Choose the Viper XIP for precision spotting and touring that demands maximum output; choose the Aura Raven XIP for productions requiring individually addressable LED effects and color-mixing sophistication.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
Specs side by side
| Martin Mac Viper Xip In Cardboard B-Stock | Martin MAC Aura Raven XIP in SiP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $11,999.20 | $11,322.00 |
| Brand | Martin | Martin |
| Fixture Type | Moving Head | Moving Head |
| Condition | Refurbished | New |
Why choose Martin Mac Viper Xip In Cardboard B-Stock
- ✓ Higher light output at 28,000 lumens with more compact 150 mm lens
- ✓ Tighter 1:9 zoom range (5.7° to 54°) optimized for long throws and spotting
- ✓ 55 × 20 W white LED engine design for consistent color temperature
- ✓ IP65 water/dust ingress protection—most weatherproof option
Why choose Martin MAC Aura Raven XIP in SiP
- ✓ 37 individually addressable RGBL LEDs enable pixel-level effects and color mixing
- ✓ Larger 343 mm front lens for broader wash coverage and even field illumination
- ✓ Silent belt-drive zoom mechanism eliminates mechanical noise during live performance
- ✓ Dual-engine architecture supports both wash and effects simultaneously
Frequently asked questions
Which fixture is brighter?
The Martin MAC Viper XIP produces 28,000 lumens versus the Aura Raven XIP's 27,000 lumens, giving the Viper a slight edge in peak output. However, the Aura Raven's larger 343 mm lens provides broader beam distribution, making it more suitable for wash applications despite lower peak lumens.
What's the main difference in LED architecture?
The Viper XIP uses 55 × 20 W white LEDs (760 W total) for consistent neutral color output, while the Aura Raven XIP uses 37 individually addressable RGBL LEDs (830 W total) that enable pixel-level color mixing and effects. The Aura Raven is built for dynamic color work; the Viper is built for brightness and consistency.
Which is better for outdoor touring?
The Martin MAC Viper XIP has an IP65 rating (full dust and water protection), while the Aura Raven XIP has an IP54 rating (splash protection). For harsh outdoor environments, the Viper XIP is the more durable choice; for standard touring with occasional outdoor use, both are reliable.
Do both support wireless and networked control?
Yes. Both fixtures support DMX over 5-pin connectors, Art-Net, sACN, and Martin P3 protocols, with modular slots for third-party wireless DMX modules. Both also offer NFC smartphone control for on-set addressing and configuration.