AMX-CCC013 vs FG2106-01-B — Compare

AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IO vs AMX NX-1200 NetLinx Integrated Controller - Compact form factor B-Stock

The AMX MU-1300 is a compact processor (1/3 rack width) with dual serial ports, 2 IR/Serial ports, and advanced Linux-based processing for complex automation, while the NX-1200 is a full 1RU NetLinx controller with single serial, 2 IR/Serial ports, and lower power consumption for traditional AV integration. Choose the MU-1300 for script-heavy automation and multi-protocol bridging; choose the NX-1200 for straightforward NetLinx-based AV and building automation.

No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.

AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IO

$1,263.00
View AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IO

AMX NX-1200 NetLinx Integrated Controller - Compact form factor B-Stock

$1,208.00
View AMX NX-1200 NetLinx Integrated Controller - Compact form factor B-Stock

Specs side by side

AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IOAMX NX-1200 NetLinx Integrated Controller - Compact form factor B-Stock
Price$1,263.00$1,208.00
BrandAMXAMX
ConditionNewRefurbished

Why choose AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IO

  • Ultra-compact 1/3 rack width saves significant rack space in tight installations
  • Dual RS-232/RS-422/RS-485 serial ports handle more simultaneous device connections
  • 4 GB RAM and 8 GB storage run sophisticated control scripts and automation routines
  • Linux-based platform offers flexible programming for complex multi-protocol scenarios

Why choose AMX NX-1200 NetLinx Integrated Controller - Compact form factor B-Stock

  • Full 1RU standard form factor integrates predictably into existing rack layouts
  • Native NetLinx architecture simplifies AV and building automation integration
  • Low power consumption reduces thermal load and operating costs
  • USB file management works without network dependency for quick commissioning
Bottom line: Select the MU-1300 if your installation requires compact form factor, script-based automation, and heavy multi-serial connectivity. Select the NX-1200 if you need a traditional NetLinx integrated controller with standard 1RU footprint and efficient power profile for standard AV and building automation systems.

Frequently asked questions

What's the main physical difference between these two controllers?

The MU-1300 is a compact 1/3 rack width processor designed to save space, while the NX-1200 is a full 1RU integrated controller with standard rack dimensions. The form factor choice depends on available rack space and installation density.

Which controller handles more serial connections?

The MU-1300 provides two full RS-232/RS-422/RS-485 serial ports plus 2 IR/Serial ports, while the NX-1200 offers one RS-232 port and two IR/Serial ports. The MU-1300 is better for installations requiring multiple legacy device connections.

Are these controllers suitable for the same types of projects?

Both are professional-grade for AV integration and building automation, but the MU-1300 excels at complex automation scripting with its Linux platform and advanced processing power, while the NX-1200 is purpose-built for traditional NetLinx-based AV system integration.

What's the difference in programming approach between these two?

The MU-1300 runs a Linux-based operating system capable of sophisticated control scripts and complex automation routines, while the NX-1200 uses the native NetLinx architecture optimized for integrated AV and building control. NetLinx is more familiar to traditional AV integrators, while MU-1300 offers greater flexibility for custom automation.

🎸

Welcome! Before we chat…

Drop your name and email so we can follow up if you reach us after hours.

We never share your info.

🟢 Specialist connected