90480170 vs 90480175 — Compare
Martin RUSH CS300 Graze RGB Color Mixing Linear Wash vs Martin RUSH CS300 Wide RGB Color Mixing Linear Wash
The Graze model has a narrow 18° × 65° asymmetrical beam for controlled grazing light on walls, while the Wide model has a broad 124° beam for even, diffuse cove coverage. Choose Graze for architectural accent lighting that sculpts surfaces; choose Wide for uniform ambient fill light in lobbies and lounges.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
Martin RUSH CS300 Graze RGB Color Mixing Linear Wash
Martin RUSH CS300 Wide RGB Color Mixing Linear Wash
Specs side by side
| Martin RUSH CS300 Graze RGB Color Mixing Linear Wash | Martin RUSH CS300 Wide RGB Color Mixing Linear Wash | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $376.60 | $376.60 |
| Brand | Martin | Martin |
| Year | Unknown | Unknown |
| Condition | New | New |
Why choose Martin RUSH CS300 Graze RGB Color Mixing Linear Wash
- ✓ Narrow asymmetrical beam angle (18° × 65°) creates dramatic grazing effects on textured walls
- ✓ Specialized optical design for accent and highlight applications
- ✓ Controlled light throw prevents spill into unintended areas
Why choose Martin RUSH CS300 Wide RGB Color Mixing Linear Wash
- ✓ Wide 124° beam angle provides seamless, even coverage across large surfaces
- ✓ Slightly lighter at 0.8 kg versus 1 kg for easier installation
- ✓ Better for uniform cove lighting without visible hot spots or shadows
Frequently asked questions
What's the key optical difference between these two models?
The Graze has an asymmetrical 18° × 65° beam designed to graze and sculpt surfaces with controlled directionality, while the Wide has a symmetrical 124° beam that spreads light evenly across large areas with minimal shadows.
Which is better for accent lighting versus general ambient cove light?
The Graze excels at accent and highlight applications on architectural features, walls, and textured surfaces. The Wide is optimized for general cove lighting and uniform ambient fill.
Are there any physical or connectivity differences?
Both share the same compact 303 × 46 mm footprint, same Cree XP-E2 RGB LEDs, same 50,000-hour lifespan, hybrid 6-pin connectors, DMX/RDM control, and bracket mounting. The only material difference is the Graze weighs 1 kg and the Wide weighs 0.8 kg.
Which works better in tight spaces?
Both fit identically into narrow architectural coves at 303 mm length and 46 mm width. The choice between them depends on beam spread—narrow asymmetrical for accents, wide for uniform fill—not on physical fit.