90234015HU-B vs 9025123579 — Compare
Martin MAC Encore Performance Warm Light Moving Head B-Stock vs Martin ERA 600 Compact Moving Head CMY Color Mixing Light
The MAC Encore Performance prioritizes whisper-silent operation and warm tungsten emulation (3000K) for broadcast and theater where noise and accurate warm skin tones are critical, while the ERA 600 delivers higher raw lumen output (19,000 vs 9,200) and a wider gobo selection (14 rotating + 8 static) for general touring and live event versatility. Choose the MAC Encore for noise-sensitive, warm-light applications; choose the ERA 600 for brightness-demanding venues and diverse gobo effects.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
Martin MAC Encore Performance Warm Light Moving Head B-Stock
Martin ERA 600 Compact Moving Head CMY Color Mixing Light
Specs side by side
| Martin MAC Encore Performance Warm Light Moving Head B-Stock | Martin ERA 600 Compact Moving Head CMY Color Mixing Light | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9,666.00 | $11,560.50 |
| Brand | Martin | Martin |
| Year | Unknown | Unknown |
| Condition | Refurbished | New |
Why choose Martin MAC Encore Performance Warm Light Moving Head B-Stock
- ✓ Whisper-silent motorized operation across all functions—ideal for broadcast and theater
- ✓ Pure 3000K warm tungsten emulation with exceptional color accuracy (CRI/CQS/TLCI >90)
- ✓ Compact 31 kg form factor with premium lumen-per-kilogram efficiency
- ✓ Spectrally complete LED rendering without green or magenta shifts
Why choose Martin ERA 600 Compact Moving Head CMY Color Mixing Light
- ✓ Nearly double the lumen output (19,000 vs 9,200) for larger venues and long throws
- ✓ More extensive effects library: 14 rotating gobos plus 8 static, 7-color wheel, prisms, animation wheel
- ✓ Wider zoom range (1:7.5 ratio, 6°–45°) for versatile coverage in diverse venue sizes
- ✓ Daylight-balanced 6500K native source with CTO correction for flexibility
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for broadcasting or theater?
The MAC Encore Performance is purpose-built for these applications: its whisper-silent operation eliminates mechanical noise pickup on microphones, and its 3000K warm tungsten emulation renders skin tones and set fabrics with superior accuracy (CRI/CQS/TLCI all >90). The ERA 600's 6500K daylight source requires CTO correction to approach warm tones and is not optimized for broadcast silence.
Which produces more light for outdoor or long-throw use?
The ERA 600 delivers 19,000 lumens versus the MAC Encore's 9,200 lumens—more than twice the output. For large outdoor festivals, sports venues, or projections at 40+ meters, the ERA 600 is the stronger choice; the MAC Encore excels in mid-sized indoor theaters and studios where its compact form and warm color matter more than peak brightness.
What are the gobo and effects differences?
The ERA 600 offers significantly more creative flexibility: 14 rotating/indexing gobos, 8 static gobos, a 7-slot color wheel, dual prisms, and an animation wheel. The MAC Encore includes 5 rotating glass gobos plus standard effects. If gobo variety and projection complexity are central to your design, the ERA 600 is the better fit.
Which is more portable for touring?
The MAC Encore weighs only 31 kg (68 lbs) with an exceptional lumen-per-kilogram ratio, making it easier to rig and transport in small trucks or when quick load-ins matter. The ERA 600 is also called tour-ready and modular, but its heavier mass and broader optical package serve larger-scale productions; for minimalist touring rigs, the MAC Encore is more nimble.