FG1061-16-FX-B vs FG1061-32-FX — Compare
AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure B-Stock vs AMX DGX3200-ENC Enova DGX 3200 Enclosure
The DGX1600 is a 16x16 matrix switcher suited for mid-to-large enterprise installations, while the DGX3200 is a 32x32 matrix switcher designed for the largest, most complex facilities requiring maximum routing flexibility. Choose the DGX1600 for established large-scale systems; choose the DGX3200 for future-proof, mission-critical deployments with dozens of sources and displays.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure B-Stock
Specs side by side
| AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure B-Stock | AMX DGX3200-ENC Enova DGX 3200 Enclosure | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14,012.00 | $31,980.00 |
| Brand | AMX | AMX |
| Condition | Refurbished | New |
Why choose AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure B-Stock
- ✓ Smaller 16x16 matrix footprint reduces complexity and cost for large but not massive installations
- ✓ Integrated NetLinx NX Controller with redundant power in proven, established platform
- ✓ Supports 4K/UHD, HDMI/HDCP, and fiber runs up to 10 km—sufficient for most enterprise venues
- ✓ B-Stock pricing offers significant savings on professional-grade hardware
Why choose AMX DGX3200-ENC Enova DGX 3200 Enclosure
- ✓ Double the switching capacity at 32x32 matrix with eight input and eight output board slots
- ✓ Handles exponentially more simultaneous 4K sources and display endpoints without bottlenecking
- ✓ Eight board slots provide greater modularity and room for future expansion without enclosure replacement
- ✓ Same redundant power and fiber connectivity as DGX1600, scaled for larger distributed facilities
Frequently asked questions
What's the core difference in switching capacity between these models?
The DGX1600 maxes out at 16x16 matrix routing (up to 4 input and 4 output boards), while the DGX3200 scales to 32x32 (up to 8 input and 8 output boards). This means the DGX3200 can handle twice as many simultaneous video sources and display endpoints.
Do both handle 4K and long-distance fiber runs?
Yes, both support 4K/UHD content and fiber transmission up to 10 km (single-mode) or 300 meters (multimode). The practical difference is bandwidth headroom: the DGX3200's larger matrix prevents congestion in high-demand facilities.
Which is better for a corporate office with 8 conference rooms and a central control room?
The DGX1600 is likely sufficient if you have under 16 total source/display endpoints. Choose the DGX3200 only if you're managing more rooms, feeds, or expect significant future expansion within the same enclosure.
Is the B-Stock DGX1600 a risky choice?
B-Stock typically means open-box, minor cosmetic wear, or customer return—functionally identical to new. Both products include redundant power and integrated control, so reliability is the same; you're just saving money on appearance.