FG1061-08-FX-B vs FG1061-16-FX — Compare

AMX DGX800-ENC Enova DGX 800 Enclosure B-Stock vs AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure

The DGX 800 is a compact 8x8 matrix switcher suited for mid-size AV installations and touring, while the DGX 1600 is an enterprise-class 16x16 switcher built for large-scale facilities requiring maximum I/O density and redundancy. Choose the DGX 800 for flexible, modular systems where you pay only for needed slots; choose the DGX 1600 for high-channel-count installations needing integrated control and fault-tolerant power.

No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.

AMX DGX800-ENC Enova DGX 800 Enclosure B-Stock

$12,892.00
View AMX DGX800-ENC Enova DGX 800 Enclosure B-Stock

AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure

$17,515.00
View AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure

Specs side by side

AMX DGX800-ENC Enova DGX 800 Enclosure B-StockAMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure
Price$12,892.00$17,515.00
BrandAMXAMX
ConditionRefurbishedNew

Why choose AMX DGX800-ENC Enova DGX 800 Enclosure B-Stock

  • ✓ Compact 4 RU form factor fits space-constrained rack installations
  • ✓ Modular slot architecture lets you configure only needed I/O boards
  • ✓ More affordable entry point to professional AMX matrix switching
  • ✓ Flexible board mix supports HDMI, DXLink twisted pair, DXLink fiber, and DVI in one chassis

Why choose AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure

  • ✓ Double the switching capacity at 16x16 versus 8x8 configuration
  • ✓ Integrated NetLinx NX Controller eliminates separate control hardware
  • ✓ Extended fiber transmission up to 10 kilometers over single-mode fiber for large-facility distribution
  • ✓ Redundant power supplies and hot-swap module replacement for zero-downtime operations
Bottom line: Select the DGX 800 if you need a scalable, modular platform for mid-size venues or touring with mixed legacy and 4K sources. Select the DGX 1600 for enterprise campuses, broadcast, or large conferences where maximum I/O count, integrated control, and redundant power justify the premium investment.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main I/O difference between these two switchers?

The DGX 800 maxes out at 8x8 routing with two video input and two video output board slots, while the DGX 1600 delivers 16x16 routing with four input and four output board slots. Both support four connections per board.

Do both include an integrated controller, or do I need separate control hardware?

The DGX 800 includes a NetLinx Controller for logic and automation. The DGX 1600 integrates a NetLinx NX Controller with a built-in management processor, eliminating the need for external control hardware entirely.

How do redundant power supplies and hot-swap capability differ?

Only the DGX 1600 explicitly features redundant power supplies and hot-swap module replacement for continuous operation without service interruption. The DGX 800 has redundant power architecture but does not advertise hot-swap capability.

Which is better for extending video signals across a large facility?

The DGX 1600 supports fiber transmission up to 10 kilometers over single-mode fiber and 300 meters over multimode fiber, making it ideal for campus-wide installations. The DGX 800 supports DXLink 4K60 fiber but does not specify maximum transmission distances.

✨
🎸

Welcome! Before we chat…

Drop your name and email so we can follow up if you reach us after hours.

We never share your info.

✨
🟢 Specialist connected