AMX-N33D001 vs AMX-N33E001C — Compare

AMX NMX-DEC-N3322D NMX-ENC-N3322D 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H Decoder vs AMX NMX-ENC-N3312D-C NMX-ENC-N3312D-C 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H & 1080p H.26x Dual-Stream Encoder Card

The AMX NMX-DEC-N3322D is a decoder that receives and outputs video from networked streams, while the NMX-ENC-N3312D-C is an encoder that captures video sources and sends them over the network. Choose the decoder if you need to display remote streams; choose the encoder if you need to distribute your local sources across a networked AV system.

No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.

AMX NMX-DEC-N3322D NMX-ENC-N3322D 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H Decoder

$2,096.00
View AMX NMX-DEC-N3322D NMX-ENC-N3322D 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H Decoder

AMX NMX-ENC-N3312D-C NMX-ENC-N3312D-C 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H & 1080p H.26x Dual-Stream Encoder Card

$2,076.00
View AMX NMX-ENC-N3312D-C NMX-ENC-N3312D-C 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H & 1080p H.26x Dual-Stream Encoder Card

Specs side by side

AMX NMX-DEC-N3322D NMX-ENC-N3322D 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H DecoderAMX NMX-ENC-N3312D-C NMX-ENC-N3312D-C 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H & 1080p H.26x Dual-Stream Encoder Card
Price$2,096.00$2,076.00
BrandAMXAMX
ConditionNewNew

Why choose AMX NMX-DEC-N3322D NMX-ENC-N3322D 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H Decoder

  • Decodes both H.264 and H.265 compressed streams for flexible source compatibility
  • 4K60 4:4:4 full-bandwidth color decoding without chroma subsampling
  • Dual Gigabit Ethernet ports with redundancy for uninterrupted playback
  • HDCP 2.2 compliance and IR control integration for automated systems

Why choose AMX NMX-ENC-N3312D-C NMX-ENC-N3312D-C 4K60 H.26x/Dante AV-H & 1080p H.26x Dual-Stream Encoder Card

  • Encodes sources simultaneously at 4K60 and 1080p for adaptive delivery to different endpoints
  • Two HDMI 2.0 inputs allow multiple source capture in one card
  • Native Dante AV-H support for direct networked AV system integration
  • USB 3.0 recording capability enables external drive archival without separate equipment
Bottom line: Professional installers and broadcast facilities using fixed AV systems should choose the encoder if they need to send local sources over the network to multiple destinations. Choose the decoder if your primary need is receiving and displaying remote networked streams on displays throughout your installation.

Frequently asked questions

What is the core functional difference between these two products?

The decoder receives compressed video streams over Gigabit Ethernet and outputs them to displays via HDMI. The encoder accepts HDMI video sources and simultaneously produces a 4K60 primary stream and 1080p secondary stream for networked distribution via Dante AV-H and RJ45 outputs.

Which product should I choose for a multi-display installation where I need to send one source to many screens?

The encoder is designed for this use case, as it captures your source material and produces dual streams that can be distributed across your network to multiple decoders or endpoints. Each decoder would then display the stream on its connected display.

Do both products support HDCP 2.2 and Dante AV-H?

Both support HDCP 2.2 for protected content. The encoder has native Dante AV-H support for encoding into that format. The decoder does not explicitly list Dante AV-H support in its description; verify with specifications if Dante AV-H reception is required for your system.

Which product is better for recording or archiving content?

The encoder includes USB 3.0 recording capability for archival to external drives. The decoder is designed for playback only and does not include recording functionality.

🎸

Welcome! Before we chat…

Drop your name and email so we can follow up if you reach us after hours.

We never share your info.

🟢 Specialist connected