3329H00010 vs 3331H00010 — Compare
AKG PCC170 SW O Professional Boundary Layer Microphone vs AKG PCC170 Professional Boundary Layer Microphone 3331H00010
The PCC170 SW O adds a switchable presence peak control for tonal shaping, while the standard PCC170 (3331H00010) offers fixed presence peak characteristics. Choose the SW O if you want real-time tonal flexibility; choose the standard model if you prefer a preset, fire-and-forget solution.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
AKG PCC170 SW O Professional Boundary Layer Microphone
AKG PCC170 Professional Boundary Layer Microphone 3331H00010
Specs side by side
| AKG PCC170 SW O Professional Boundary Layer Microphone | AKG PCC170 Professional Boundary Layer Microphone 3331H00010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $540.00 | $510.00 |
| Brand | AKG | AKG |
| Condition | New | New |
Why choose AKG PCC170 SW O Professional Boundary Layer Microphone
- ✓ Switchable presence peak for on-the-fly tonal adjustment
- ✓ Greater versatility across different performance styles and venues
- ✓ Swiss-made construction with explicit reliability emphasis
- ✓ Better suited for podcasters and performers who need control
Why choose AKG PCC170 Professional Boundary Layer Microphone 3331H00010
- ✓ Simpler operation without switches to manage
- ✓ Fixed sonic character optimized for studio and presentation settings
- ✓ Robust construction with smooth frequency response out of the box
- ✓ Slightly more straightforward for conference and documentation work
Frequently asked questions
What's the practical difference between these two models?
The SW O includes a switchable presence peak control, letting you adjust brightness in real time. The standard PCC170 has a fixed presence peak tuned for balanced performance. Both use identical boundary layer cardioid designs and are Swiss-made with professional reliability.
Which is better for live podcasting?
The PCC170 SW O is better for podcasting because the switchable presence peak lets you dial in the exact brightness you want without re-recording or post-processing. The standard model works fine too, but offers less adjustment flexibility.
Are these suitable for recording acoustic instruments?
Both excel at acoustic instruments. Both deliver articulate, balanced, transparent capture with minimal coloration. The SW O gives you more tonal control if you're layering different instruments; the standard model is equally transparent and simpler to set up.
Can either handle high-SPL sources like drum kits?
Neither is ideal for close-miking high-SPL drums or extreme metal. Both are designed for vocals, acoustic instruments, presentations, and moderate-level studio work where clarity and natural response matter more than extreme SPL handling.