9025121795 vs 9025121796 — Compare
Martin ERA 400 Performance Warm LED CMY Color Mixing Light vs Martin ERA 400 Performance Cold LED CMY Color Mixing Light
The Martin ERA 400 Warm is optimized for tungsten-emulation and warm lighting design with 3,200K color temperature and 6,000 lumens, while the Cold version delivers crisp, daylight-balanced 6,500K output at 10,000 lumens for video-forward and color-accurate applications. Choose Warm for theater, corporate, and intimate venues; choose Cold for broadcast, concert touring, and productions requiring saturated color definition.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
Martin ERA 400 Performance Warm LED CMY Color Mixing Light
Martin ERA 400 Performance Cold LED CMY Color Mixing Light
Specs side by side
| Martin ERA 400 Performance Warm LED CMY Color Mixing Light | Martin ERA 400 Performance Cold LED CMY Color Mixing Light | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $7,630.84 | $8,522.00 |
| Brand | Martin | Martin |
| Year | Unknown | Unknown |
| Condition | New | New |
Why choose Martin ERA 400 Performance Warm LED CMY Color Mixing Light
- ✓ 3,200K warm white LED engine mimics traditional tungsten fixtures
- ✓ 1,200 Hz LED refresh rate optimized for broadcast and video recording
- ✓ Lightweight and road-ready at 22.5 kg with modular effects design
- ✓ CRI >91 ensures accurate warm color rendering
Why choose Martin ERA 400 Performance Cold LED CMY Color Mixing Light
- ✓ 10,000 lumens output—significantly brighter for large venues and touring
- ✓ 6,500K crisp daylight-balanced color temperature for vibrant, saturated hues
- ✓ Full 540° pan and 260° tilt range for comprehensive coverage
- ✓ Four dimming curves and strobe/pulse effects for dynamic visual effects
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference in brightness between these two?
The Cold model produces 10,000 lumens of intensity versus the Warm model's 6,000 lumens—a 67% increase. The Cold's higher lumen output makes it better suited for large touring rigs and arena venues, while the Warm's 6,000 lumens suffices for theaters and smaller installations.
Which is better for video and broadcast work?
The Warm model includes a 1,200 Hz LED refresh rate specifically designed to eliminate flicker in video and broadcast recording. The Cold model does not emphasize this spec, making the Warm the safer choice for productions involving cameras.
How do the color temperatures differ in practice?
The Warm model outputs 3,200K (matching incandescent tungsten) with CRI >91 for accurate warm tone reproduction, ideal for dramatic or intimate lighting. The Cold model's 6,500K is daylight-balanced and delivers more saturated, vibrant colors in concert and high-energy event contexts.
Are both models equally portable for touring?
Both weigh 22.5 kg and feature modular designs, so they are equally portable. The Warm model highlights its modularity and road-readiness explicitly, while the Cold model emphasizes its compact form factor and truss-mounting capability—both are suitable for touring operations.