11901-002 vs 11901-003 — Compare
Seymour Duncan PowerStage 170 vs Seymour Duncan Power Stage 200
The PowerStage 170 is a ultra-compact, heat-efficient option with a 3-band EQ and 170W output, while the Power Stage 200 delivers more wattage (200W @ 4Ω), fuller connectivity, a 4-band EQ with cab simulation, and headphone monitoring. Choose the 170 if pedalboard real estate is critical; pick the 200 if you need comprehensive I/O, cab modeling, and monitoring flexibility.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
Specs side by side
| Seymour Duncan PowerStage 170 | Seymour Duncan Power Stage 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $399.00 | $499.00 |
| Brand | Seymour Duncan | Seymour Duncan |
| Condition | New | New |
Why choose Seymour Duncan PowerStage 170
- ✓ Extremely compact footprint (5 x 5.24 x 2.84 inches) for tight pedalboards
- ✓ Class D efficiency minimizes heat generation during extended sessions
- ✓ Level control range of 0–47 dB handles most input sources without external gear
- ✓ 170W at 4 ohms sufficient for medium to large venues
Why choose Seymour Duncan Power Stage 200
- ✓ Higher power output (200W @ 4Ω, 117W @ 8Ω) provides extra headroom
- ✓ 4-band EQ plus switchable cab simulation for tone flexibility
- ✓ Comprehensive connectivity: XLR DI, 1/8" aux input, and dedicated headphone output with level control
- ✓ Pre-Post EQ switch lets you place cab simulation before or after tone shaping
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for amp modeling into a PA system?
Both handle amp modeling well. The PowerStage 170 prioritizes portability and efficiency with clean amplification. The Power Stage 200 adds an XLR DI output for direct mixing console feeds, making it more flexible in professional PA environments where you need simultaneous speaker and direct outputs.
Do either have cab simulation?
Only the Power Stage 200 includes integrated, switchable cab simulation. The PowerStage 170 offers only a 3-band parametric EQ without cab modeling, so you'd need to use cab simulation in your amp modeler or effects unit upstream.
Which fits a crowded pedalboard better?
The PowerStage 170 is considerably more compact—roughly the size of a single wide pedal. The Power Stage 200 occupies about the width of two standard pedals side-by-side, making the 170 the clear choice for space-constrained boards.
Can I use either for silent practice or recording?
The Power Stage 200 includes a dedicated 1/4" headphone output with independent level control and 1/8" aux input for backing tracks, making it ideal for silent practice. The PowerStage 170 lacks these monitoring features and would require external solutions.